State of the Union

‘No arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is as formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women.’- Ronald Reagan

I just finished reading the Narcissist in Chief’s State of the Union Address from last evening. No, I didn’t watch it on television. Yes, I’ve seen snippets of it on every news channel from Fox to CNBC. The overall context of the speech, as I interpret it, is that we need more Obama in our lives, now more than ever before. He is still the one for whom we’ve been waiting. Yadda, yadda, yadda. I, we, us, I, I, me, my, and mine. It’s all about Obama, and he is the only one who can save us from ourselves.

This man, who has no background in this country of ours, who was not raised here, who did not form even one of his life’s opinions on American soil, proposes to ”feel our pain.” To understand the little guy who can’t find a job. To fret over the teacher who may lose her job. To understand a small business owner who can’t float a loan to sustain his business. He’s spent the majority of his brief time in office talking scathingly of the banking industry, the automobile industry, the insurance industry, and Wall Street, and how they’re all out to hurt the little guy and he’s not going to put up with it, so he’s instituting all kinds of new rules, regulations, laws, and taxes to punish them for their bad policies and make them toe the line. After spending his first twelve months in office denigrating these industries and harping on their corporate greed, and crying over what the previous administration left him, he stands there innocently, scratching his head, wondering why our economy didn’t jump up and improve, the very minute he said it should.

He says that he never said that change was going to be easy, or that he could do it alone. Well, it hasn’t been easy for Americans to swallow, and he did have far more help than we expected to plunge us into head first into his Progressive agenda. While there is precious little to celebrate at this point, you can bet that he will be there ready to stand with his head cocked and his chin raised, to take all of the credit for whatever improvement may be identified. Until then, he will continue to blame everyone else, including his fellow elected officials, and especially the former administration, for all that is wrong.

Many say this president is out of touch with America. I argue that one can not lose what one never had. This foreigner can not be expected to understand the depth of feeling that defines every American. He’s not an American, not in his heart. Why do you think it’s so hard for him to find his heart when he hears the National Anthem? Why do you think it’s so easy for him to bow to the leaders of foreign lands? Why do you think it was so easy to make fun of Scott Brown because he drives a pickup truck? He is not one of us. He does not understand freedom or liberty as the average American does. He was raised in a foreign country, and when he did come to this country, it was to go directly to the hallowed halls of big education, to be indoctrinated further into the liberal-elite mindset of educators.

This passage in his speech speaks to his thoughts on our Constitution. I read not one reference nor did I hear any pundit comment on these words: “Abroad, America‘s greatest source of strength has always been our ideals. The same is true at home. We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal, that no matter who you are or what you look like, if you abide by the law you should be protected by it, that if you adhere to our common values you should be treated no different than anyone else.” While I appreciate the reference to that great document, I question his wording of “the notion that we are all created equal,” and “that if you adhere to our common values, you should be treated no different than anyone else.” The Constitution does not directly address equality of men, and as I remember from the Declaration of Independence, there was no notion of the equality of all men; rather, there was a declaration of equality of all men. Nor was I aware that the Constitution protected our common values. The Constitution outlines the definitions of government and frames the rights of the individual people of the land. Notions and common values. Is this what our leader thinks of the rights and privileges which are preserved by our founding documents?

I fear that to him and his friends, we are the little people, the ones who pay for the likes of him and his minions. There are so many of us that to have won our vote is to have won control. To control all of us is the gateway to unlimited power and resources. Does that sound familiar to you? He’s only just begun to taste it. He is the one for whom we have waited. He is the one who will change America. And he was telling the truth; he has changed America. We are less free today than we were a year ago.  Are we going to do anything about that?

Advertisement
Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

24 Comments on “State of the Union”

  1. Frank C Says:

    Very well said Sterling…He certainly spins things doesn’t he.

  2. Pat Says:

    as usual very well written sterling your insights into him are just brilliant and your writings are so understandable keep up the good work


  3. I usually agree with your article content, but in this case I am sorry to say that I do not share your views.

    • Sterling Says:

      Thanks for taking the time to read and comment. There’s no need to apologize for disagreeing. Tell me what your thoughts are on this subject. I’d appreciate reading them.

  4. capmotion Says:

    Your insights are right-on. The only shared value which our Constitution contemplates is the Liberty which enables us to soar or to fail based on our personal industry, with the risk of failure inspiring all to learn to soar accordingly to their own devices, and government is to stay out of the way. The national government has a limited role, and spilling beyond those limits invades and eviscerates the Liberty that is the foundation of the Republic. Liberty is defined in terms of no government involvement in our lives, whether that involvement be of elevation or of suppression.

  5. Sterling Says:

    Thank you so much, cap. I appreciate you taking time to read, and to comment. Your comments are astute and enlightening, and your knowledge of our founding documents is much appreciated here. I welcome all that you are willing to share.

  6. chas Says:

    Nicely done Sterling. One thing people don’t get is that freedom is a definable quantity, there is a limit to how much there is available.

    With each power the Federal Government assumes it comes at the expense of your freedom.

  7. capmotion Says:

    chas raises an important point that people too often do not understand. Liberty is defined by absence of government involvement in people’s lives and activities, and hence every law that is passed [unless it is simply repealing a previous measure] represents an erosion of overall liberty – every law somehow limits some person or some people from doing something, and limitations on people by government are axiomatically invasions of liberty. Liberty cannot be expanded by government; liberty is the absence of government action/focus.

    • chas Says:

      “Liberty cannot be expanded by government; liberty is the absence of government action/focus.”

      Or for the dumber people like me, “Nature hates a vacuum”. It always fills the void. So if you give freedom away, the Government gladly accepts it and assumes the power.

      Cap is the BEST at putting the finer points on things.

  8. Sterling Says:

    Thanks again, cap, for your knowledgeable voice. I love that last line, that liberty is the absence of government action/focus. Wonderful!

    • capmotion Says:

      Thank you, Sterling, and my dear chas. It is very important for people to get their heads around the idea that any action by government, the enactment of any law [except one that fully and unconditionally repeals a previous law], diminishes the overall quantum of liberty. Too many naively look to government to “give” them “freedom,” and that is an oxymoron. Freedom is an absence; the presence of government in the arena of life is the absence of absence.

  9. Gini Says:

    The first time ‘the police’ stopped one of my sons, and searched the car w/no cause, I knew ‘things were not right’. Excellent Sterling…excellent! Of course, the ol’ lady down the block ‘felt safer’ I am sure! After all, they weren’t trying to COME IN HER HOUSE, after all!!! I am still furious, obviously, as we have watched ‘things’ deteriorate since, dramatically recently, fr where ‘we began’….where we are headed is indeed scary, if the people don’t take a stand, I agree Sterling. We’ll see won’t we, if they have the ‘stomach’ for ‘the fight’ against the evil that is upon us.

    • capmotion Says:

      Police stopping and illicitly harassing people is one of my favorite and recurring themes, because it represents the ultimate example of governmental tyranny, since few cops are ever punished for the same sort of conduct that would get the rest of us, the sovereigns of this Republic, hauled off to the gray-bar hotel.

      I have won well over 1000 motions showing cops violated people’s constitutional rights in my career [resulting in dismissals of criminal cases for which clients were arrested and prosecuted], which is a federal felony by, as well as inviting civil damages against, the malfeasing cops. Guess how many cops were prosecuted, fired, or sued based on that? Zero. In the name of “law enforcement,” the ultimate law being the Constitution, the “law” is rarely “enforced” against the “law enforcers.” Strange! And they think we have not devolved into a police state!

      • Sterling Says:

        Thanks for that comment, cap. I have many casual acquaintances in the field of law enforcement, and that’s where I wish them to belong in my little word! With the exception of one ticket for a seat belt violation when that ridiculous law was passed in my state, I managed to live the first 32 years of my life with no interaction with the law. When I was 32, the day before Thanksgiving, I was T-boned in an intersection, with my dog in tow, on the way to the bank. Thankfully, I was driving a big ole tank of a car, an Olds 98, and save for a scratch on her nose and the general confusion of an accident, neither my dog nor I were injured. The car, however, was another story, having been broad-sided by a big F-350 truck. When the officer showed up to make the police report, he instructed both the other driver and myself to get into his patrol car while he took our statements and filled out the report. Having never been invited into a cruiser, I did not realize that there were no handles in the backseat and that you are at the mercy of someone outside the vehicle if you’d like to exit, and so when the other driver practically pushed me over to jump into the front seat, I didn’t know that I’d be trapped in the backseat. While sitting in the back, waiting for the other driver to complete his statement, and slowly coming out of my fog from the confusion of the accident, I realized that my dog was still sitting in my car, with the passenger side crushed and the window and door displaced, in a busy intersection, and on top of being quite traumatized herself over what had just happened, she was very concerned of her mistress’s whereabouts. I suddenly realized that I couldn’t exit the police cruiser. I interrupted the officer and the other driver and asked politely to be let out of the vehicle. The officer very tersely told me to sit still, he’d be with me in a moment. I then told him that I needed to check on my dog. He rudely instructed me that my dog was just fine, and he’d let me out when he was finished with my statement. I sat there for about one second and then told him that if I was not under arrest, he’d better let me exit his cruiser this second. He told me that he would let me out when he ascertained who, if anyone, was at fault in this accident. Now I ask you, how hard is it to ascertain who was at fault when my car was in the middle of the intersection with the big ole nose print from a truck in it’s side? I had to argue with this idiot for five minutes before I finally told him that my dog was just that, MY DOG and MY PROPERTY and she was unattended and if any further harm came to her, he was going to be hearing from more than just me about my rights that were in violation. He finally let me out of the cruiser, and after checking on my dog, I stood my my vehicle where he took my statement after I refused to get back into the cruiser, front or back seat. He was sorely miffed that he had to complete his report standing outside in the snow.

        A very minor incident to you, I’m sure, in light of the many cases to which you have attended, but I finish by saying that I left that experience with two important observations. One, unless I am in handcuffs or a coma, I will never again willingly enter the backseat of a police cruiser for any reason whatsoever, and two, police officers are not interested in my rights so much as their own comfort level and their own agenda. And to that, I say “screw your comfort level, and your agenda.”

    • Gini Says:

      The exact same thing happened when I got rear ended on the expressway a few months ago Sterling. I was astonished at the antagonistic behavior by the ‘cop on the scene’. I was more ‘shook up’ by his arrogant behavior towards me, the injured party, than the accident itself. I agree…getting in the ‘back seat’ of the police vehicle is a bad plan!!! I was also uninjured, and the car was ‘uninjured’ as well…’98 Lincoln….indestructible!!! ha! :) He actually threatened me w/a ticket as well…..even w/the witness statements that I was in no way responsible. Amazing event!

      • Sterling Says:

        That is what shook me, too, Gini; the arrogant and authoritarian attitude of the officer. This accident was just that: an accident. There was no malice, and after running plates upon his immediate arrival to the accident, he should have know that he was not dealing with criminals and stolen vehicles. I’ve spent the years since then with a very jaded view of law enforcement. I used to think that they had the best interest of the citizen at heart. Now, not so much. I must tell you that there is a glimmer of hope in my jaded view. When my mother unexpectedly passed away a few years ago, the officers in attendance (some of those aforementioned acquaintances) could not have been more helpful or accommodating in our hour of need. Perhaps there is hope!

      • Gini Says:

        Exactly Sterling, and they were remarkable and wonderful, when dealing w/dad, and the times he ‘ran off’, after he became mentally incapacitated w/Alzheimer’s disease…informed, gentle and very very nice. Maybe the ‘cop’ was annoyed abt the paper work involved w/the accidents, but indeed, it was over the top directed at the ‘wrong persons’, when dealing w/me in an accident situation…

      • capmotion Says:

        Geeze, I sure wish I could get the Ginis and Sterlings on my juries; the people generally sitting there seeth when I have the temerity to point out the truth that cops are frequently liars and overbearing.

        We must not forget that a proactive constabulary was evicted from these shores, in complaint #10 of the Declaration, as inimical to what the Founders were setting up, and that blight on our liberty never re-emerged until after the war of northern aggression, when Lincoln proved that “emergency” and “war on [whataver is in vogue at the time]” could support spilling over the boundaries laid down by the Founders.

      • Gini Says:

        Actually Cap, I always considered I would be an excellent jurist, tho I have NEVER been called once! and I ALWAYS vote! lol grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr…

      • Sterling Says:

        I will sit on a jury if cap is in charge!! Call me!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.